Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Page 8 | Page 9 | Page 10 | Page 11 | Page 12 | Page 13 | Page 14 | Page 15 | Page 16 | Page 17 | Page 18 | Page 19 | Page 20 | Page 21 | Page 22 | Page 23 | Page 24 | Page 25 | Page 26 | Page 27 | Page 28 | Page 29 | Page 30 | Page 31 | Page 32 | Page 33 | Page 34 | Page 35 | Page 36 | Page 37 | Page 38 | Page 39 | Page 40 | Page 41 | Page 42 | Page 43 | Page 44 | Page 45 | Page 46 | Page 47 | Page 48 | Page 49 | Page 50
Michael Ubaldi, October 6, 2003.
Glenn Reynolds provides an excellent roundup of news that best describes the reconstruction of Iraq: unfinished (in fact, still in its first stages), a bit uncertain, but progressing and only adding to the population's strengthening optimism - optimism that began in mid-April when their oppressor's disgusting statues and effigies were torn to pieces.
The best part? Much of the coverage is also self-critical - yes, journalists are a little unhappy journalism lately. As the Instapundit puts it, "Big Media is catching on."
Michael Ubaldi, October 4, 2003.
Kirkuk, a multiethnic city of Kurds, Arabs, Turkmen and Assyrians that is 150 miles north of the capital, may be the U.S. military's greatest Iraq success story. Attacks on soldiers are unusual, violent crime is low, and Iraqis have worked with Americans to restore basic services to prewar levels.
Michael Ubaldi, October 3, 2003.
David Kay came to Washington. While many on the left cackled about the lack of clearly marked stockpiles of ready-to-use weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and continued to insinuate that Bush viewed the threat as specifically "imminent" - he did not, quite clearly rebuking the idea with "Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent" - David Kay delivered a very encouraging public report. Where some see a vindication of Saddam Hussein, Andrew Sullivan has been blogging overtime to lay out the big picture. His strongest point quotes Kay directly:
If you don't have time, here are my highlights. First off:We have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002. The discovery of these deliberate concealment efforts have come about both through the admissions of Iraqi scientists and officials concerning information they deliberately withheld and through physical evidence of equipment and activities that ISG has discovered that should have been declared to the UN.
Sullivan goes on to highlight more evidence of Saddam's discrete weapons programs. Don't forget this, either. Bottom line? Senator Jay Rockefeller was smugly chatting with the press yesterday about "no surprises," though what actually came to no surprise was Saddam's relentless drive towards [and illegal possession of!] catastrophic weapons.
AND ANOTHER THING: Here's a lesson in deductive reasoning. The remnants of dictatorships don't ferret out and assassinate scientists if no programs or stockpiles exist to which the scientists can lead Allied troops.
GO AHEAD, SURPRISE ME: Watching David Kay's interview on television this morning was encouraging and frustrating. Encouraging: David Kay repeated to Tony Snow an impressive amount of finds, including botulinum precursor ordered into a scientist's refrigerator; and the factual tidbit that Iraq houses dozens of weapons caches, some as large as  square miles, twenty-six of which are high-priority and have not been searched yet. Frustrating: Kay himself was annoyed at how newspapers and other media ignored almost all of it. Which makes this recap, published in the International Herald Tribune and reprinted in the New York Times, important to offest the politicized obfuscation we saw a couple of days ago. Good for them.
Michael Ubaldi, October 2, 2003.
The interest of some in Washington to stick Iraq with a reconstruction loan - cop-out national security at its worst - is offensive enough. Raising taxes is economically unwise, poorly reasoned (some hikes to be flung several years down the road) and a not-so-subtle trojan horse ("No New Taxes II") for Bush. But it's unconscienable for Congress to wax statesman with these proposals when available resources are obvious, and within their very oversight. From the Wall Street Journal today:
There's another way to offset [the $87 billion aid package]. Congress could clean up some of the waste, fraud and abuse in the federal budget. House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle has been pushing his fellow House chairmen to do just that. Today he will announce what they've turned up. And, wouldn't you know it, they found $85 billion to $100 billion that could be saved even without cutting any services.
Michael Ubaldi, October 1, 2003.
Rumors of the prime minister's premature retirement were, in fact, greatly exaggerated:
The government today comfortably won a vote on Iraq at its Bournemouth conference - after a two hour debate which saw pro-war delegates outnumber and out-clap critics by about two to one.
Michael Ubaldi, September 30, 2003.
As per my finger-snap title, if only Action Jackson were over in Baghdad, embracing "all the colors of the rainbow" as Iraqis prepare to apply measured care to swift progress in drafting a constitution. French, one-month-and-out anarchical nonsense aside, we should expect a full range of disagreements, walkouts, journals, appeals to the populace and even some Federalist Paper letters in news publications. It won't be polite all the time - nor will it be intellectually dull. That will be something to look forward to. Until then, Iraqis themselves know the significance of the document they will begin to craft:
"It's impossible to do it in six months as Mr. Powell wants," said council member Dara Noureddine, the council's liaison with the committee. "It's unreasonable. It takes more time than this - much more."
Glenn Reynolds wonders about the constitution's specifics and offers some bloggers' thoughts, particularly on Federalism. Given the tentative nature of even the preliminary negotiations, it's unlikely anything concrete exists. Nor can assurances from any one constitutional delegation, when the convention begins, be appreciated as more than part of the political and legal debate. With that in mind, we can return to the standards set in place by the occupational authority:
L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. civil administrator of Iraq, has said the constitution will be "written by Iraqis, for Iraqis." But he has also said the Bush administration expects the final document to embody principles adopted during a U.S.-sponsored conference of Iraqis in April near the ancient ruins of Ur. Those principles include federalism, democracy, nonviolence, a respect for diversity and a role for women.
ALSO: A look at our own Constitutional Convention of 1787. The process wasn't linear, taking several months - even with an existing body of fair laws like the Articles of Confederation and without the baggage of modern, Stalinist tyranny.
Michael Ubaldi, September 28, 2003.
The autocrat, Wahhabist-promoting Saudis won't be sending any of their armed forces into Iraq. Seeing as how Saudi nationals, under the flag of terrorism, are already underway in the country, we can most likely agree that Iraq's reconstruction doesn't need any more meddling, er, aid from Riyadh.
Here's hoping the Bush administration made the proposition as unattractive to the kingdom as possible.
Michael Ubaldi, September 26, 2003.
Just back from the far side of the moon? You're in time to shop for Chief Wiggle's toy drive for Iraqi kids. I'll be heading to the necessary stores tomorrow.
Michael Ubaldi, September 24, 2003.
Bill Hobbs on weapons of mass destruction:
Something struck me upon re-reading the transcript of President Bush's Address to the United Nations General Assembly - his mentioning of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction programs without mentioning the lack, so far, of finding big caches of such weapons in liberated Iraq (at least that has been revealed publicly).
With Kay to reveal his findings soon, we may witness certain members of Congress and the political establishment looking very nervous and growing very quiet before they get clobbered by mounds of incontrovertible evidence publicly presented in a few months. If national security remains a major election issue in November of next year, quite a few political careers could be irreparably damaged - not least the nominee from the Democratic presidential candidates, all of whom have made some hay of the weapons issue.
Regardless of what the president has planned, politicans are unwise politically, logically, and morally to indirectly defend Saddam Hussein while attempting to damage Bush in lieu of conspicuous piles of weapons and facilities. Especially those who stated beliefs to the contrary under the same circumstances in 1998.
Michael Ubaldi, September 22, 2003.
You'll never guess who said this:
Free trade will be a critical element to [our country's] growth.
One of the most overlooked powers of a democratic Iraq - understandable now, given today's security uncertainties - is its cultural allure as a market center and a symbol of the Muslim world's escape from tyranny. Growing into an economic powerhouse in the Near East is easy against the region's dismal record; with increasingly mobile and high-tech international trade, Iraq has an excellent chance of becoming a true diamond in the rough - gaining the benefits of the free-market West without suffering from its geographical position. Their own unemployment rates ranging from an estimated 12% to 25%, Iraq's totalitarian, Islamic neighbors will quickly find their people looking to the spontaneous prosperity of Baghdad, back to the worthless society offered by their governments, and then back to Baghdad. If Damascus, Riyadh, Cairo and other capitals aren't clobbered by revolts for individual rights and wealth opportunities, Iraq's borders could become the Rio Grande Valley of the Near East, as swarms of disgruntled Arabs and Persians stream into the country seeking what Mexicans (among many other extranationals) seek here in the United States every day: a better life. While they're at it, the exiting or rioting masses may wave off for good the old attraction of anti-Western, Islamist hysteria - recognizing it as the horrific excuse for perpetual oppression and hopelessness that it is. By losing many thousands of prospective recruits to decent, honest living, terrorism and dictatorship will be dealt a serious blow, much of it accomplished without the firing of a single American bullet.